HOME CONTACT
GET FREE E-MAIL ALERTS  
 
Saturday, 19 May 2012, 18:51 MST
 
 
HEADLINES TODAY
 
HEADLINES THIS WEEK
 
COMPLETE NEWS LIST
 
CTIM WEBSITE
 
NEWS
LEGISLATION
JUDGMENTS
REGULATORY
EVENTS
BOOKS & ARTICLES
STUDENTS
INDUSTRY UPDATES
JUDGMENTS
Customs Appeal Tribunal: Smart Card Printer v DG of Customs
FACTS

The Appellant is a private limited company incorporated on 14 July 1987. The Appellant is in the business of importing Smart Cards (Kad Pintar) since 1988 for supply to institutions of higher education and banking institutions. During importation, the Appellant had used the tariff code 8542. 12 000, which was subject to a sales tax of 10%. However, the tariff code was changed (date not stated) to 8542. 10 000, which was not subject to any import duty or sales tax. Beginning from 2004 until 2006, the Appellant had used the tariff code 8542. 10 000 for importation of the Smart Cards.

On 3 August 2006, Bahagian Perkhidmatan Teknik Cawangan Auditan Pasca Import Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur carried out an audit on the Appellant’s company. The audit finding was that the Appellant had declared the Smart Cards as a non-dutiable good (tariff code 8542. 10 000) whereas the correct tariff code should be 8543. 81 000, which was subject to a sales tax of 10%. A Bill of Demand for the period of 2004 to 2006 amounting to RM372,701.06 was issued to the Appellant for payment. The Appellant was dissatisfied with the Bill of Demand and applied for a Customs Ruling under section 11B Sales Tax Act 1972.

The Director General of Customs decided in the Customs Ruling dated 31 July 2007 that the Smart Card is under tariff code 8543. 89 000 which is subject to a sales tax of 10%. The Appellant was aggrieved with the decision of the Director General of Customs and filed a Notice of Appeal at the Customs Appeal Tribunal on 29 November 2007.

ISSUE

The ground for appeal is that the Smart Card is of a hybrid type which combines contact (90%) and contactless (10%) elements whereas the tariff code under the Sales Tax Order does not contain any code which can accommodate this type of hybrid card. The Appellant is also of the opinion that the Smart card is under tariff code 8542. 10 000 and is not subject to any import duty or sales tax because the contactless element of the card is only at the antenna which is 10% of the entire price of the card.

(After the appeal was filed, the parties negotiated for settlement as provided under section 141P Customs Act 1967. As a result of the negotiations, an agreement was reached where the Appellant agreed with the tariff code of 8523. 52 000 as determined by the Customs Department whereby the Smart Card is not subject to any import duty or sales tax).

DECISION

The Tribunal recorded the decision with the agreement of both parties under regulation 13(2), Customs (Appeal Tribunal) Regulations 2007 by making an order that the importation of a Smart Card with a single chip or more is under tariff code 8523. 52 200, which is not subject to any import duty or sales tax. The appeal was dismissed.
E-mail this Story
Print this Page
Share via Facebook
Date of  Judgment : Tuesday, 20 May 2008
Original Title : Smart Card Printer v DG of Customs
Suit No : [2007] CAT 1 (Appeal No. TRK (J) 1-2007)
Court : Customs Appeal Tribunal
The above is a summary of a ruling of the Customs Appeal Tribunal (CAT)*, as prepared and provided by the CAT for publication on MLTIC Tax portal. MLTIC will publish CAT rulings (summaries) periodically. 

* CAT is an independent judicial body established to provide a fair, transparent and speedy procedure for dissatisfied persons to appeal against the decision of the Director General of Customs and to enhance the efficiency of the tax administration appeal system to make it more business and client friendly. It was established on 1 June 2007. 

You shall not reproduce the above/attached material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of the CAT. The Publishers and/or the CAT will not be liable for any loss, injury, claim, liability, or damage caused directly, indirectly or incidentally to errors in or omissions from the above/attached materials. The Publishers and/or the CAT also disclaim and exclude all liabilities in respect of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance upon the whole or any part of the above/attached material. The access to, and the use of, the MLTIC web portal and contents herein are subject to the Terms of Use.
 
 
 
CLASSIFIED
Vacancies
List of available vacancies for tax professionals
Products & Services
List of products and services relevant to tax professionals
 
MORE JUDGMENTS
Customs Appeal Tribunal: Producer of Beverages v DG of Customs
Customs Appeal Tribunal: Smart Card Printer v DG of Customs
Court of Appeal: NV Alliance Sdn Bhd v Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri
High Court: Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri v Khind-Mistral (Borneo) Sdn Bhd
High Court: Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri v Khind-Mistral (Borneo) Sdn Bhd
High Court: Maxis Communications Berhad v Ketua Pengarah Hasil Dalam Negeri and Another
 
© Chartered Tax Institute of Malaysia
About
Terms of Use
Disclaimer
Privacy Policy
RSS Feeds
Sitemap
Resources